More
GET STARTED

Under Siege: Cybersecurity Failures Sound the Alarm

The public has been aware of cyber incidents for a long time, but recent high-profile cybersecurity breaches have ignited fresh concerns and garnered elevated attention. These incidents underscore the persistent threats that exist to businesses across industries, hospitals, and even the cryptocurrency market. What valuable lessons can we extract or re-emphasize from these events as we close out Cybersecurity Awareness Month?

Money Alone Can’t Buy You Security: MGM Resorts

The most conspicuous incident in recent memory was the substantial cyberattack on MGM Resorts, a global leader in hospitality and entertainment. MGM boasts generous IT and security budgets, essential for maintaining their seamless gambling operation around the clock. However, despite substantial investments in IT resources and attention to cybersecurity, this attack forced the company to take the drastic step of shutting down its highly sophisticated IT systems completely. While the precise nature of the attack’s origins will become clearer over time, the immediate impact was disruption of the company’s operations — and the raising of critical questions about customer data security. Financial implications of the attack are beginning to appear, as well.

The MGM incident highlights the paramount importance of cybersecurity in the hospitality industry, where customer trust and data protection are non-negotiable. An attack can ripple across multiple operational facets, including financial operations, physical security, planning and client services. It serves as a stark reminder that no organization, regardless of its size or reputation, is immune to cyber threats. To safeguard their operations and customer data, companies must make continuous investments in cybersecurity measures and build robust incident response plans.

Target on Crypto Funds: North Korean Hackers

In a daring cyber heist, North Korean hackers reportedly siphoned off $41 million in cryptocurrency to finance their ongoing cyber activities. Their target was a cryptocurrency exchange, where they exploited vulnerabilities in the security infrastructure to pilfer the digital assets. While criminal activity has long plagued crypto operations, financial threats have also become a persistent concern.

This incident involving North Korea underscores the audacious and relentless nature of cybercriminals. Cryptocurrency exchanges are particularly attractive targets due to the potential for substantial financial gains. To shield against such attacks, exchanges must prioritize security, conduct regular audits, and educate users about best practices for securing and accessing their digital assets.

Healthcare Sector Vulnerabilities: Prospect Medical Cyberattack

This year has witnessed a surge in healthcare cyberattacks, an unsettling reality confirmed by emerging reports. These attacks are especially dangerous, as they can jeopardize sensitive patient data and essential medical services. In a recent attack, Prospect Medical, a healthcare management company in California and Pennsylvania, fell victim to a cyberattack that disrupted its operations. Beyond these operational hindrances, Prospect Medical encountered billing issues with Medicaid and is grappling with an extensive recovery process. Reports also suggest the financial toll and implications of the breach could affect a planned sale of various hospitals, extending the impact to future business operations.

This incident underscores the life-threatening consequences of cyberattacks targeted toward healthcare organizations. They can disrupt patient care, compromise sensitive medical records and even impact the organization’s future business plans. The lesson here is clear: robust cybersecurity measures, regular staff training and investments in technology that guard against threats are imperative.

Key Takeaways

These recent cyber incidents offer several vital takeaways that can be applied more broadly:

  • No Entity is Immune: Cyber threats can impact any organization, from global corporations to local hospitals. Acknowledging this reality is the first step in developing a proactive cybersecurity strategy.
  • Invest in Cybersecurity: Investing in cybersecurity infrastructure, regular updates and employee training is not an option; it’s a necessity in today’s digital landscape.
  • Rethink and Reset on Cyber: Major incidents provide an opportunity to reevaluate cybersecurity programs and strategies from top to bottom, and to extract insight from tough lessons learned.
  • Comprehensive Security is a Must: Whether through outsourcing, partnerships or in-house measures, comprehensive security, 24/7 monitoring, early detection, incident response and actionable insights are non-negotiable.
  • Ransomware Preparedness: Robust backup and recovery solutions are essential to minimize disruption and data loss in the face of ongoing ransomware attacks.
  • Investing Wisely in Cybersecurity: While financial resources are essential, effective cybersecurity goes beyond budget size; it requires a holistic approach to protection and readiness.

Cybersecurity: A Continuous Imperative for Safeguarding the Digital Future

The recent cyberattacks on MGM Resorts, cryptocurrency exchanges and healthcare organizations serve as stark reminders that the cybersecurity landscape is continually evolving with high stakes. In the spirit of Cybersecurity Awareness Month, let’s remember that readiness is not a choice. Organizations must take proactive measures to protect their digital assets and customer data. Safeguarding the digital future is a collective responsibility that demands continuous improvement, collective action and the latest tactics and technologies to address evolving risks.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Awaken From Cyber Slumber: 3 Steps To Stronger Cybersecurity

Everywhere you look, you can see the profound impact of technology on our daily lives. Digital transformations have reshaped industries, empowered businesses, and brought essential services closer to our fingertips. From health information to financial transactions, educational resources, and more, our reliance on technology is undeniable. Yet, amid this technological marvel, it’s alarmingly easy for individuals and organizations alike to find themselves in a state of complacency, or what one might call “cyber slumber.” This month, as we observe Cybersecurity Awareness Month, it’s the perfect time to wake up – from C-level executives and investors, to employees, suppliers, and customers. It’s time to acknowledge both the dangers and opportunities associated with a robust cybersecurity posture.

Step 1: Understand the Stakes

Every organization, regardless of size or industry, faces a monumental challenge: to safeguard its digital assets in an ever-evolving cyber threat landscape. Failing to manage cybersecurity risks can have devastating consequences, not just for the business but for individual careers. The ever-watchful adversary is omnipresent, poised to exploit the smallest vulnerability whether it be through stealing, damaging, or holding an organization hostage. In this fast-paced world of cybersecurity, complacency is a luxury no one can afford. Failing to act promptly can result in severe financial losses, reputational damage, and legal repercussions. Success, or even just survival, in today’s digital realm requires an unrelenting focus on strong cybersecurity.

Step 2: Break the Preset Mentality

Organizations often fall into a trap where they believe that past investments in security solutions have adequately addressed specific threats. However, this mentality can lead to blind spots, as these solutions might not be updated or adapted to the evolving threat landscape. In cybersecurity nothing is set in stone, and an unwavering position of assurance can lead to an organization’s downfall. Threats evolve, the scope of risks changes, and countless transformations occur over time. Thus, a static approach to security has proven to be the “Achilles’ heel” of even the most prominent technology operations. The modern organization must discard this static mindset and embrace an agile, adaptive approach.

Step 3: Reset the Cybersecurity Landscape

Now, with the shackles of the past released, organizations have the opportunity to bolster their resilience against modern cyber threats. This can be seen as a “reset,” and is where foundational aspects of cybersecurity are reviewed and addressed one by one.

  • Employee Training: The human component remains the weakest link in many cybersecurity scenarios. Continuous awareness training empowers staff to recognize and respond to potential threats effectively.
  • Behavior Analysis: Implementing user behavior analytics helps identify unusual users, data, and application activities that may indicate a breach.
  • Incident Response Plan: A well-documented incident response plan is essential for responding swiftly and effectively to security breaches.
  • Multi-Level Proactive Security Approach: A comprehensive strategy encompasses multiple layers of proactive security measures and addresses various attack vectors.
  • Vendor Evaluation: It’s important to evaluate the cybersecurity practices of third-party vendors, as they can be potential entry points for attackers.
  • Cloud Security: Implementation of cloud-specific security measures such as identity and access management (IAM), intrusion detection, and continuous monitoring of cloud environments.
  • Continuous Assessment: Cybersecurity is an ongoing commitment that involves regular assessments to evaluate security measures, identify vulnerabilities, and adapt to emerging threats.

This recipe, along with the motivation provided by Cybersecurity Awareness Month, serves as a catalyst for resetting cybersecurity resources to address vulnerabilities and protect your organization. By continuously assessing and improving, and educating employees, and remaining vigilant, you can significantly reduce both the risks and consequences associated with cyber threats. For businesses, awakening from a state of cyber sleep is not an option; it’s a strategic imperative.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Ready For Cyber Readiness – Any Time Now

Cybersecurity Awareness Month (CSAM) takes place each October, and is a dedicated month to raise awareness about cybersecurity’s importance. Cybersecurity Awareness Month typically brings forth a wealth of advice aimed at a wide audience. The public is inundated with fundamental recommendations such as using strong passwords, verifying app authenticity, and enabling multi-factor authentication. However, for businesses seeking practical guidance, this landscape can be challenging to navigate. Among the myriad insights, there is one piece of wisdom that stands above all: the importance of being ready to face the unknown.

Protecting Your Digital Frontier

The significance of cybersecurity readiness cannot be overstated, given the myriad threats that persist in today’s world. In the ever-advancing realm of technology, these threats are continually evolving and evolving in tandem. Regardless of size or industry, organizations must maintain vigilance and adopt a proactive stance. Of all the awareness we seek to cultivate this month, the most critical theme is the enduring pursuit of readiness.

Sweet Entropy: The Changing Landscape of Cybersecurity

The cybersecurity landscape is in a perpetual state of flux. It encompasses new technologies, tactics, threats, services, and events from diverse sources. Fresh attack vectors emerge regularly, while threat actors refine their techniques and intensify their pursuit of sensitive information and system vulnerabilities. In this dynamic environment, everything an organization has built, no matter how impressive, could be vulnerable to the next significant breach. This includes point technologies and Security Operating Centers (SOCs). The only response is to remain poised to build and rebuild as required.

Understanding Cybersecurity Readiness

When concepts materialize into plans, the portrait of cybersecurity readiness emerges. It involves a spectrum of proactive measures and strategies aimed at being prepared to confront potential cyber threats. This readiness encompasses not only the deployment of security tools and technologies, but also the development of a cybersecurity culture that permeates every level of an organization. This multi-level presence epitomizes the comprehensive security principles that underpin the most secure environments in the industry. Awareness and evaluation remain constant factors within systems, expertise, and operational programs that are guided by comprehensive security strategies.

Key Components of Cybersecurity Readiness

Approaches to navigating the transition from concept to application of cybersecurity readiness may vary, but certain elements persist. They include:

  • Risk Assessment: Understanding an organization’s unique vulnerabilities is the first step in cybersecurity readiness. A comprehensive risk assessment identifies potential threats and helps prioritize security measures.
  • Robust Policies and Procedures: Well-defined cybersecurity policies and procedures ensure everyone in the organization knows their responsibilities and how to respond to security incidents.
  • Incident Response Plan: A well-crafted incident response plan minimizes the impact of a cyberattack by outlining the steps to take when an incident occurs, and helping mitigate damage and prevent further breaches.
  • Security Technologies: Implementing a layered security approach with firewalls, intrusion detection systems, antivirus software, and encryption helps protect against a wide range of threats.
  • Regular Updates and Patch Management: Keeping software, operating systems, and applications up to date is crucial for plugging known vulnerabilities that cybercriminals can exploit.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Real-time monitoring of network traffic and systems can help detect and respond to threats as they happen, reducing the time attackers have to wreak havoc.
  • Education and Training: Employees are often the weakest link in cybersecurity. Regular training and awareness programs can help staff recognize phishing attempts, social engineering tactics, and other common attack methods.

The Benefits of Cybersecurity Readiness

Investing in cybersecurity readiness is worthwhile, and offers several advantages:

  • Reduced Risk: By proactively identifying and mitigating threats, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of a successful cyberattack.
  • Protection of Reputation: Cyber incidents can damage an organization’s reputation. Being prepared and responding effectively can minimize the negative impact.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Many industries are subject to cybersecurity regulations and standards. Maintaining readiness helps organizations stay compliant and avoid legal consequences.
  • Cost Savings: Preventing cyber incidents is often more cost-effective than dealing with the aftermath. Readiness helps you to avoid the financial and reputational costs of data breaches.

Path Forward

To forge a path to a secure and resilient future, it’s imperative to embrace the mission of cybersecurity readiness without delay. The cost of inaction is simply too high, and the stakes too great. It’s essential to be prepared for the unforeseeable. By engaging with seasoned cybersecurity experts and professionals, and forming strategic alliances in this dynamic landscape, organizations can reinforce their digital frontier, ensuring a steadfast, secure future for their operations and upholding the trust of their esteemed customers.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Signs of an Inadequate Security Operations Center

The security challenges faced by organizations are critical, and the ability to detect and navigate these challenges can determine a business’ survival. This means the role of a Security Operations Center (SOC) has never been more crucial than it is today, and an effective SOC stands at the forefront of an organization’s cybersecurity defense. Whether you have established an in-house SOC or you partner with a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), it is vital to recognize that not all SOCs are created equal. Some inadvertently fall short in delivering the necessary protection protocols to properly safeguard sensitive data and systems.

As we have seen in recent big company hacks, money and large budgets alone cannot buy security. Just because you’re paying a lot for your SOC does not guarantee it is effective. There are several indications of an inferior SOC, and it’s essential to watch for these telltale signs to ensure your organization remains well-protected. Taking the time to assess your SOC and look for gaps in effectiveness and integration can make a significant difference. This process also allows organizations to realign operations, make informed technology choices, and select a service partner that can transform operations into a robust and secure environment, aligned with the top-level mission.

Awash in Signals

SOCs face a myriad of challenges and problems that can impact their ability to effectively detect, respond to, and mitigate security incidents. To describe these challenges as complex would be an understatement, however there are several key signs that should raise red flags:

1. Unclear Focus

SOCs should undergo a measurable, continually improving range of clear, meaningful behavior incentives. When a SOC prioritizes behaviors that do not directly contribute to security effectiveness, it’s a sign the team’s focus may be misguided. Attributes of this condition include:

  • Ticket Quantity Over Quality: Some SOC environments gauge performance based on the number of tickets opened and resolved. While ticket volume is an important metric, it should not overshadow the quality and thoroughness of incident detection, response, and resolution.
  • Alert Fatigue: SOC analysts may find themselves inundated with alerts that are poorly tuned or irrelevant to real threats. If analysts are chasing false positives or dealing with an excessive number of low-priority alerts, it indicates an inefficient SOC.
  • Compliance Over Security: An inferior SOC may prioritize meeting compliance requirements at the expense of robust security. While compliance is essential, it cannot be the sole focus; it may not cover all potential threats and vulnerabilities.
  • Focus on Alerting vs. Resolution and Root Cause: Ineffective SOCs often prioritize alerts and incident notification at the expense of comprehensive resolution and addressing root causes. While timely alerts are crucial, a myopic focus on alerting can lead to a reactive approach. A proficient SOC should not only detect incidents, but swiftly move towards resolution and identifying the root causes behind breaches. The ability to resolve threats and address underlying vulnerabilities is fundamental in minimizing the impact of security incidents and preventing their recurrence. Without a concerted effort to shift from alert-centric operations to a resolution-driven mindset, an SOC may find itself repeatedly grappling with the same issues, leaving the organization exposed to persistent risks.

2. Depth of Expertise

Most traditional SOCs adhere to the traditional Managed Detection and Response (MDR) framework. While MDR services encompass specific steps needed to address security concerns, such as identifying which alerts require the most attention, sandboxing, malware analysis, and troubleshooting security vulnerabilities, they often fall short in the most critical aspect – “responding” to the threat and mitigating the underlying vulnerability. A modern SOC should possess the following capabilities:

  • Ability to Remediate Infrastructure: The ability to dive deep into infrastructure and patch systems is essential. Threats often linger within networks and systems for extended periods, requiring strong IT expertise that many SOCs lack. This capability may involve deep networking knowledge or close collaboration with the Network Operations Center (NOC). Without these capabilities, issues may take an unnecessarily long time to resolve, burdening IT teams further.
  • Recovery Capability: The SOC should be able to invoke a recovery plan from a well-established Disaster Recovery or Managed Backup program, depending on the organization’s Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTO). Without these skills, timely and graceful recovery in the event of a breach may be unattainable.

3. Gaps in 24/7 Coverage

Security controls that are not operational around the clock are a significant concern. This can lead to vulnerabilities going undetected for extended periods. Key indicators to watch for include:

  • Scheduled Downtime: If security controls are routinely taken offline for maintenance, it should be done strategically and with minimal impact. Prolonged downtime can leave the organization vulnerable.
  • Outdated Signatures and Rules: Neglecting to update and maintain security control signatures and rules can result in these controls missing newer threats and attacks.
  • Inadequate Resource Allocation: A lack of sufficient resources, such as personnel or technology, can lead to intermittent monitoring and control failures.

4. Stagnation in Operations

A robust SOC should continually strive for operational improvements. Any sign of stagnation or a lack of active efforts to enhance processes should raise concerns. When you encounter this, you may observe:

  • Repetitive Incidents: If the same types of security incidents persist without effective mitigation or proactive preventative measures, it suggests a lack of operational learning and improvement.
  • Manual and Time-Consuming Tasks: Inefficient processes that rely heavily on manual tasks can be a red flag. An advanced SOC should leverage automation, AI and machine learning to streamline operations and respond more effectively to threats.
  • Lack of Training and Skill Development: An inferior SOC may not invest in ongoing training and skill development for analysts. This can result in outdated knowledge and ineffective response to emerging threats.

Always Evaluating and Improving

A security operations center should always strive to remain on the cutting edge of security, however for many this is not reality. Recognizing the signs of an inadequate SOC operation is crucial for maintaining a robust cybersecurity posture. Ensuring critical SOC initiatives, maintaining focus, continual improvement, and regular gap assessments are essential steps in guaranteeing the effectiveness and efficiency of your Security Operations Center. Organizations should regularly evaluate their SOC’s performance and make necessary adjustments to ensure the highest level of protection against evolving cyber threats.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Impact of the IoT Trust Mark on Cybersecurity in the United States

New government-driven cybersecurity initiatives can be difficult to embrace. They tend to veer towards regulation, reporting, bureaucracy, and other constructs that add to IT operations requirements. By nature, they include an effort-driven adoption period that organizations must plan for and process.

The rapid proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has long been a critical cybersecurity topic, appearing at the forefront of technology ecosystem discussions. To address concerns surrounding IoT security, the US government recently introduced the long-awaited “Cyber Trust Mark.” This landmark initiative establishes a comprehensive labeling program that empowers consumers to make informed decisions about the security of their IoT devices.

The Need for IoT Security Labeling

The proliferation of interconnected devices, from smart home appliances to industrial machinery, has ushered in a new wave of convenience and efficiency. However, this proliferation has also exposed vulnerabilities that malicious actors can exploit. IoT devices, if not properly secured, can become entry points for cyberattacks, leading to data breaches, privacy violations, and even compromise of critical infrastructure. The US government’s launch of the Cyber Trust Mark recognizes these risks and signifies a pivotal step in addressing IoT security concerns directly.

The Cyber Trust Mark is poised to bolster consumer confidence in IoT devices by providing clear and standardized security information. Just as nutrition labels on food products offer valuable information to consumers, the Cyber Trust Mark is designed to offer information regarding a device’s security features, privacy controls, and data protection measures. This transparency is intended to help consumers make informed purchasing decisions, and opt for devices that align with their security preferences and needs.

Core Elements of the Cyber Trust Mark

With introduction of the Cyber Trust Mark, consumers will gain insight into the following elements of their IoT products:

  • Manufacturer Accountability: Information about the manufacturer’s commitment to cybersecurity, including their track record in responding to security incidents.
  • Device Security: Evaluation of the device’s security measures, including encryption protocols, secure boot processes, and the presence of regularly updated firmware.
  • Data Privacy: Privacy controls and data handling practices will come under scrutiny, with information about whether data is being collected, how it’s being used, and controls over sharing.
  • Vulnerability Management: Assessment of the manufacturer’s approach to identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, as well as their responsiveness to releasing security patches.

A Ripple Effect on the Industry

The introduction of the Cyber Trust Mark is likely to have a profound impact on the IoT industry as a whole. Manufacturers will be incentivized to enhance security practices, to both differentiate their products through strong security measures and build consumer trust. This initiative could catalyze a shift towards a security-first mindset within the industry, elevating the overall state of IoT security.

Many manufacturers will need to adapt to this new initiative, which will likely launch new missions to define and embrace cybersecurity, privacy, and responsible management. Another side benefit is that typical consumers will enjoy more exposure to cybersecurity measures and lexicon s as a matter of everyday consumption.

The Road Ahead

The introduction of the US IoT Trust Mark represents a significant step towards addressing the pressing cybersecurity concerns associated with the exponential growth of IoT devices. This initiative promises to empower consumers with essential information about device security, data privacy, and manufacturer accountability, guiding more informed choices. Moreover, it’s poised to foster a culture of heightened cybersecurity awareness within the IoT industry, encouraging manufacturers to prioritize security and build consumer trust. While ongoing vigilance remains vital, the Cyber Trust Mark serves as a positive beacon in our interconnected world, guiding us towards a more secure and resilient future within the IoT landscape.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

The Rising Threat of QR Code Phishing: Protecting Your Credentials

October is Cybersecurity Awareness Month! As designated by the US Government’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), October is a dedicated time for the public and private sectors to work together to raise awareness about the importance of cybersecurity. Ntirety has always been focused on security, and this month we’re sharing a variety of content to highlight ways to combat dangerous cyber threats. One of this year’s official Cybersecurity Awareness Month tips for staying safe is “Recognize and Report Phishing,” and in this blog post we’ll explore the emerging threat of QR code phishing attacks and how you can protect yourself and your organization.

In today’s digital age, cybersecurity has become a paramount concern for individuals and organizations alike. Cyber threats are increasingly prevalent, with one of the most common attack vectors being credential theft. Phishing is a method often employed by threat actors to gain access to credentials. As these attackers become more sophisticated, it’s crucial to stay informed and vigilant.

Credential Theft: A Persistent Threat 

The foundation of many cyberattacks lies in the theft of user credentials. Whether it’s your email, social media accounts, or workplace login, credentials are a valuable commodity for cybercriminals. Once they gain access to your account, attackers can not only steal sensitive information, but wreak havoc and potentially compromise an entire organization.

The Power of Phishing Attacks 

Phishing is a tried-and-true, and fairly simple, method for harvesting credentials. Phishing involves tricking an unsuspecting individual into revealing their login information, through a communication that appears legitimate in nature. While traditional email-based phishing attacks are well-known, a new variant has been on the rise: QR code phishing attacks.

QR Code Phishing: A Growing Threat 

QR codes have become ubiquitous, appearing on restaurant menus, flyers, and even in advertising campaigns. Their ease of use and the quick access to information they provide make them an attractive choice for both legitimate businesses and malicious actors. As the name implies, QR code phishing attacks involve threat actors leveraging the convenience of QR codes to deceive targets. To carry out the attack, a cybercriminal will send an email containing a QR code, typically disguised as an authentication attempt or a seemingly harmless link. When the user scans the QR code, they are redirected to a malicious website designed to download malware or harvest their valid credentials. What makes this threat even more insidious is that it can also target less protected devices, such as mobile phones and tablets. While this often occurs over email, some QR code phishing attacks also involve placing QR Codes in physical locations, such as on posters, flyers, and product packaging. The QR code may be placed in a location where it is likely to be scanned, such as a public place or a busy area.

Protecting Yourself from QR Code Phishing 

It’s crucial to remain vigilant and take proactive steps to protect yourself and your organization from QR code phishing attacks. Some methods of defense include:

  • Cybersecurity Awareness Training: Regularly educate yourself and your employees about cybersecurity best practices. Understanding the evolving threat landscape is the first line of defense.
  • Phishing Attack Simulation: Conduct regular phishing attack simulation tests to assess your team’s preparedness and ability to identify phishing attempts.
  • Not Trusting Unverified QR Codes: Only scan QR codes from trusted sources. If you receive a QR code via email be extremely cautious, and don’t scan it unless you are 100% certain it’s from a legitimate sender.
  • Reporting Suspicious Activity: If you encounter any suspicious emails or QR codes, report them immediately to your organization’s Security Operations Center (SOC) or IT department. Many organizations have a “Report Phishing” button in their email client to facilitate this process.
  • Thinking Before You Click: When scanning a QR code, be cautious if it leads you to a webpage requesting confidential information. If in doubt, do not scan, or stop and seek assistance from your IT team.
  • Staying Informed: Keep up to date with the latest cybersecurity news and advisories, as this can help you recognize emerging threats and how to identify them.

Ntirety can help your organization stay secure with service offerings in each of these areas.

One Compromised Account, Many Consequences 

Remember, a single compromised account can have far-reaching consequences that extend well beyond the breached account or device. A single point of compromise can serve as the gateway to a massive breach, with impacts for not only your personal data, but also the security of the organizations you interact with.

As with all cyber threats, it’s essential you stay vigilant, stay informed, and protect your credentials from the growing threat of QR code phishing. We’ll be sharing more insights on cybersecurity all month long, so be sure to check back on the Ntirety blog, or visit the Ntirety website to learn more about Ntirety’s Managed Email Security Service, and how Ntirety works to secure the Ntirety of your organization.

 

Sources Consulted and Further Reading

Why Companies Are Struggling With Cybersecurity: Big Players In Bad Situations

Major entities like Microsoft and governmental bodies continually stumble in the face of persistent cyber threats, despite having abundant resources at their disposal. It’s baffling to witness, and this article explores the pressing question: “Why does this keep happening?” As headlines continue to reveal vulnerabilities within even the most robust cybersecurity infrastructures, the need for a comprehensive security approach becomes abundantly clear. The irony of the situation cannot be ignored: even industry giants falter, and in doing so expose cracks in current cybersecurity strategies and emphasize the imperative of a holistic defense.

Unveiling the Paradox of Big Players in Bad Situations

Names like T-Mobile, Capital One, TikTok, MGM, and Prospect Medical stand out among the casualties of malicious cyber events. These situations, where tech titans with thousands of cybersecurity experts find themselves grappling with cyberattacks they couldn’t fully comprehend, stick out like a sore thumb. The same holds true for governmental bodies entrusted with safeguarding national interests. The gap between cybersecurity rhetoric and practical implementation repeatedly results in breaches that compromise data, disrupt operations, and erode trust.

Fragmentation of Cybersecurity Tools

It is particularly frustrating when the cybersecurity landscape is flooded with tools and solutions targeting specific threats— from phishing training to endpoint security and everything in between. However, the Achilles’ heel lies in the fragmentation of these point products. Instead of an integrated and comprehensive approach, we end up with a disjointed and compartmentalized strategy that hackers exploit. The SolarWinds event magnified this issue, emphasizing the need for a more cohesive strategy. Throwing money at the problem without a holistic approach to the solution is ineffective.

Breaking Down the Walls: A Comprehensive Vision

The exposure of sensitive personal and financial data from a misconfigured web application firewall affecting over 100 million customers underscores the far-reaching impacts of a single security lapse. As does a massive casino chain paying nearly $15 million in ransom to hackers, and another shutting down operations in the wake of a cyberattack, resorting to recording customer information with pen and paper. These incidents persist because of the failure to adopt a comprehensive security vision that covers an organization’s entire IT landscape. The necessary mindset shift involves moving from reactive security measures to proactive and holistic protection. Cybersecurity isn’t just about acquiring the latest tools; it’s about fostering a culture of awareness, vigilance, and constant monitoring, and integrating security measures into every layer of the IT architecture.

The prospect of uncapped penalties for breaches emphasizes that the status quo is no longer tenable. Organizations must reevaluate their cybersecurity strategies as interconnected fortifications, and seamlessly weave security into the fabric of IT operations to ensure that every system, application, and device contributes to resilience against threats.

Rethinking Internal Security Operations

In the quest for robust cybersecurity, it’s crucial to question the logic behind organizations continually building and investing in their own Security Operations Centers (SOCs). After all, businesses don’t typically invest in constructing their own power plants or water purification plants; they rely on specialized external entities to provide these critical services. In a similar vein, cybersecurity requires expertise and resources that extend beyond the capabilities of in-house teams. The futility of attempting to create a fortress within the organization becomes evident when we consider the ever-evolving threat landscape. Cybercriminals adapt quickly, and their tactics become increasingly sophisticated. Maintaining an internal SOC not only requires substantial financial investments, but demands constant training, monitoring, and adaptation to keep pace with the evolving threat landscape. Organizations can benefit from adopting a more pragmatic approach by leveraging the expertise of external cybersecurity firms, much like they rely on external utilities for power and clean water. This allows them to tap into a broader pool of specialized talent and resources, to enhance their overall cybersecurity posture and free up internal resources to focus on core business functions.

Comprehensive Is All or Nothing

The state of continual cyber incidents reminds us that even organizations with significant resources can fall victim to cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities in their infrastructure. Comprehensive security is an absolute necessity in today’s cyber threat landscape. It encompasses monitoring, disaster recovery, detection, response, culture – and a commitment to covering every possible aspect of process, people, technology, and tools with cyber-aware security policies and protections.

In the face of an ever-evolving cyber threat landscape, a comprehensive security assessment is not just a consideration; it’s a necessity. This proactive approach empowers organizations to identify vulnerabilities, address weaknesses, and bolster defenses against potential cyberattacks. By embracing a holistic security assessment strategy, businesses can navigate the digital realm with confidence, ensuring the protection of sensitive data, maintaining customer trust, and safeguarding their operational continuity.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Enterprise SOCs: How They Work and Why Most Are Insufficient

In the realm of cybersecurity, the concept of a Security Operations Center (SOC) serves as a bastion against the relentless tide of cyber threats. However, delving deeper into the intricacies of how a SOC operates reveals that the notion of an enterprise SOC can sometimes be misleading, akin to a company attempting to run its own power plant in an era of renewable energy, or building their own data center amidst an abundance of cloud services. As we peel back the layers of SOC operations, it becomes evident that enterprise-launched SOCs can quickly prove insufficient in the face of today’s cyberthreats.

Decoding the Inner Workings and Challenges of a SOC

A SOC is the vigilant guardian standing between an organization’s sensitive data and the multitude of cyber adversaries seeking to breach its defenses. Its arsenal is comprised of a concoction of technological marvels, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), log analysis, and real-time threat detection mechanisms. To build and maintain an effective SOC, organizations invest in a spectrum of expertise from cybersecurity analysts to incident response teams. All of this sounds great; you want a well-structured SOC to act as your organization’s digital sentry, shield, and sword.

Realities begin to hit when significant challenges emerge for SOC environments, though. These challenges include:

  • Overwhelming Alert Volumes: The rapidly evolving threat landscape results in an avalanche of alerts from various security tools. Amidst this influx, critical alerts may become lost or buried beneath a sea of false positives or low-priority notifications.
  • Visibility Gaps: The lack of comprehensive visibility into an organization’s entire digital ecosystem leaves blind spots ripe for exploitation. Attackers then exploit these gaps.
  • Sophisticated Threats: Cybercriminals are adept at crafting attacks that evade conventional security measures. Advanced malware, zero-day vulnerabilities, and sophisticated social engineering techniques evade detection and call for heightened vigilance.
  • Alert Fatigue: Overburdened analysts grappling with a barrage of alerts can experience alert fatigue—a condition where the volume of alerts diminishes their ability to discern genuine threats from false positives.
  • Ineffective Contextualization: Isolated alerts provide limited context, making it challenging for analysts to gauge the severity and scope of an incident. This lack of contextualization hampers timely and accurate decision-making.
  • Legacy Solutions: Some SOCs rely on legacy technologies that lack the agility and sophistication needed to combat today’s modern threats. These outdated solutions struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving attack techniques.

The flaws of an enterprise SOC begin to emerge with one subtle yet impactful component that can break everything in one cyber event: Why are you doing this anyway?

The Limited Lens of an Enterprise SOC

An enterprise SOC, no matter how robust, can only glimpse the threats present in its own digital kingdom. If Coca-Cola were to launch a SOC (and they might have), for example, that SOC has no insights into the flow of threats across the entire spectrum of the digital realm. Threat feeds are, at best, a backfill. This isolated perspective hinders a comprehensive understanding of the evolving threat landscape. Coca-Cola’s SOC probably knows a lot about threats to the food and beverage industry, but they are myopic by nature when it comes to the complex landscape of threats affecting organizations at large.

Service-Based Collective Security

Today’s cyber threats transcend company borders, necessitating more collective defensive capabilities than before. The digital landscape is brimming with cunning, malicious adversaries who are constantly evolving their tactics. Today’s cybercriminals seem to care more about attack opportunities than specializing in specific targets, and this interconnectedness of threats necessitates an equally interconnected defense mechanism.

Service-based SOCs wield the power of detection and protection for thousands of clients. They have assembled teams of seasoned cybersecurity professionals, implemented the best monitoring practices, incorporated cutting-edge technologies, and achieved scalability, flexibility, cost-efficiency, collaboration, and more. This reduces the burden for organizations, allowing them to focus on their core business competencies and what they were created to do. Going back to the Cola-Cola example, it allows them to focus on making and selling soft drinks.

Within the service-based SOC model, the intelligence gleaned from a single incident has immense value. Knowledge from a single event ripples across the entire network and all clients, allowing the service-based SOC to better fortify others against similar threats. By pooling resources, expertise, and insights, organizations can elevate their defense capabilities through security services that utilize a breadth of telemetric data from various sources.

It is time to challenge the notion of siloed defenses, often represented through the enterprise SOC. More importantly, it is time for organizations to break free from the idea of building their own.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Navigating Multicloud Realities: Practical Approaches For Success

The multicloud approach has emerged as a strategic cornerstone in modern IT architecture, promising unprecedented agility, resilience, and cost optimization. Beyond the buzzword, the practicality of multicloud lies in its ability to address a range of challenges that arise in a diverse and ever-evolving digital landscape. Yet the advantages and pitfalls of the multicloud strategy can be confusing, making the journey and opportunities out of reach for many.

The Imperative of Diversification

Diversification is at the heart of a successful multicloud strategy. A guiding rule of this strategy dictates that we place our digital “eggs” in more than one cloud “basket” in order to maintain continuous operations. This is a maxim that immediately applies to both operational and disaster recovery (DR) scenarios. Relying on a private cloud or another cloud provider for DR ensures that if one cloud stumbles, your business operations remain unaffected.

Geographical diversification is a step in the right direction, but not always sufficient to thwart risks. Even industry giants like AWS and Azure have grappled with networking issues and service down conditions while implementing this approach. By spreading workloads across multiple cloud providers, organizations mitigate the impact of region-specific outages and ensure uninterrupted service availability.

The Imperative of Cloud Cost Arbitrage

Cost optimization is another area where multicloud strategy shines. Cloud providers are known for their pricing variability, and leveraging multiple clouds can offer significant cost arbitrage opportunities. The ability to leverage different clouds for varying needs introduces the potential for significant savings. For instance, one cloud provider might offer more budget-friendly storage options, while another might excel in compute resources. This enables organizations to strategically allocate workloads to capitalize on the strengths of each cloud provider, fine-tuning expenses without compromising performance.

Security Considerations for Cloud Diversification

In addition to cost-saving and operational benefits, cloud diversification plays a pivotal role in enhancing an organization’s cybersecurity posture. Cyber threats are ever-evolving and can target specific cloud providers or regions. By distributing workloads across multiple cloud environments, companies can reduce their vulnerability to single points of failure and minimize the potential impact of security breaches. Furthermore, different cloud providers often have diverse security protocols and infrastructure, making it challenging for attackers to develop a one-size-fits-all approach to breach multiple clouds simultaneously. This diversity in security measures adds an extra layer of defense, providing organizations with a more robust security framework. In essence, cloud diversification is a strategic move in safeguarding sensitive data and critical business operations from the constantly shifting threat landscape.

Reaching The Edge

Cloud diversification extends beyond the realms of cost, resilience, and security; it is also instrumental in harnessing the potential of edge computing. Edge locations, often situated closer to end-users or devices, demand low-latency, high-performance computing resources. By incorporating cloud diversification into an edge computing strategy, organizations can strategically deploy workloads to the nearest cloud providers or edge nodes, ensuring optimal responsiveness for real-time applications and services. This approach both minimizes latency and enhances the scalability and reliability of edge computing solutions. In essence, cloud diversification empowers organizations to seamlessly bridge the gap between centralized cloud data centers and edge locations, ushering in an era of efficient, responsive, and data-intensive edge computing applications.

Residency and Regional Advantages

Residency requirements and regional price disparities can significantly impact the choice of cloud provider. Some countries impose stringent data residency regulations that mandate certain data to remain within specific geographic boundaries. Multicloud strategy allows organizations to cater to such demands while also tapping into cost advantages prevalent in certain regions. Countries like Germany, Austria, and even parts of the Far East present unique pricing dynamics that multicloud strategies can capitalize on.

Multicloud in Action: Real-World Examples

For many, a multicloud baseline is the product of happenstance and business activities. Mergers, new locations, contractual matters, colo and native data centers, development efforts, and countless other factors might cause an organization to be multicloud just by being breathed into existence. However, strategically-oriented multicloud can capitalize on the advantages and minimize risks overall. Even with a ‘default’ multicloud in place, arriving at an optimized and continuously optimizing strategic multicloud is very achievable. In one of the simplest real-world scenarios, one cloud provider can serve as the primary infrastructure and host mission-critical applications. The secondary cloud provider stands at the ready, prepared to take over if the primary experiences disruptions. This dynamic redundancy ensures minimal downtime, highlighting how multicloud can be a game-changer for the organization. Combined with the factors of cost arbitrage, integration of services, workload refactoring, and regional/residency, the combinations and possibilities are nearly limitless.

Navigating the Challenges of Multiple Clouds

While the benefits of multicloud strategies are clear, it’s essential to acknowledge the inherent complexities and challenges that come with managing multiple cloud providers. Coordinating and optimizing workloads across diverse cloud environments can be a daunting task. Each cloud provider has its unique set of tools, services, and pricing structures, necessitating a deep understanding of each platform. Ensuring data consistency, security, and compliance across multiple clouds demands meticulous planning and continuous monitoring. Moreover, mastering multicloud dynamics requires a skilled workforce proficient in various cloud technologies. Organizations must invest in training and expertise development to harness the full potential of their multicloud strategy. Despite these challenges, the rewards of resilience, flexibility, cost optimization, and edge computing capabilities make the journey of mastering multiple clouds a worthwhile endeavor for forward-thinking businesses.

Mastering Multicloud Dynamics

Beyond being a buzzword, multicloud strategies offer a tangible and practical path to address the multifaceted challenges of contemporary IT architecture. Embracing a diversified approach ensures that disruptions caused by outages or challenges in one cloud are effectively mitigated by the presence of others, enhancing resilience and enabling cost optimization, regional advantages, and disaster recovery preparedness. Furthermore, cloud diversification extends its utility to edge locations, bridging the gap between centralized cloud data centers and edge environments. This ushers in an era of efficient, responsive, and data-intensive edge computing applications. As multicloud strategy continues to evolve its relevance only strengthens, marking a significant shift in how organizational IT ecosystems adapt to the dynamic digital landscape.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Unveiling The Cyber Conundrum: Why Government Hacks Outpace Mega Corporations

In today’s interconnected digital landscape, cyberattacks have become an unfortunate reality impacting government institutions and mega corporations alike. However, a notable disparity emerges when we compare the frequency with which the US government reports breaches compared to major companies like Target, Google, Facebook, Apple, or Microsoft. Is there an inherent lack of diligence on the part of government entities, or is something else at play?

Public Obligation and Transparency

One significant factor contributing to the difference in reported breaches lies in the contrasting obligations of disclosure for the government and corporations. When a government entity is hacked, it bears public obligation to announce the breach promptly. This stems from the need to uphold transparency and prevent any exploitation or coercion by concealing such incidents. In contrast, corporations, although subject to regulatory requirements for disclosure, may not face the same level of public scrutiny or potential backlash. Consequently, some companies may choose not to report certain breaches to protect their reputation and brand image, leading to the perception of a lesser number of breaches at large.

Beyond Reporting: Disparity in the Number of Attacks

Some of the disparity in the number of attacks is related to the reporting of governmental events versus those of major corporations. However, much of the discrepancy can be attributed to a difference in the actual number and frequency of attacks impacting the two groups. By many measures, governmental agencies are more vulnerable to attacks for a few key reasons.

Organizational Structure and Resources

The intricate organizational structure of the government can play a role in its vulnerability to cyberattacks. With numerous agencies and departments distributed across vast geographic locations, there are often more logical and physical gateways into government networks. Attackers may find more potential entry points, making the task of securing these networks immensely challenging.

Use of Legacy Technology

One crucial factor contributing to the government’s higher susceptibility to cyberattacks is the prevalence of legacy technology in some agencies and departments. Unlike large corporations that continually update and upgrade their systems and stay at the forefront of cybersecurity, some government entities still rely on outdated technology and software. These legacy systems often lack the latest security patches and updates, making them easier to breach and more susceptible to exploitation by cybercriminals. Additionally, the bureaucratic nature of government decision-making and budget allocation processes can lead to delays in implementing technological upgrades. This lag in adopting modern cybersecurity solutions and keeping them updated creates an opportunity for attackers to target and exploit vulnerabilities in outdated systems.

Point Solutions and Fragmented Security Approach

In contrast to the comprehensive cybersecurity strategies employed by mega corporations, the unfortunate reality is that some government agencies have fragmented security approaches. Different departments within the government at times implement their own security solutions, resulting in a lack of centralized coordination and consistency. This fragmented approach can lead to gaps in defense, where attackers can exploit weak points at the intersections between different systems. Moreover, the lack of a unified security framework can make it challenging for IT teams to detect and effectively respond to cyber threats.

The Pervasiveness of Cyber Threats

The Edward Snowden disclosures shed light on the impressive capabilities of cyber espionage agencies, particularly the NSA. Over time, other nations have likely developed similar capabilities, and with the advent of AI the scalability of cyberattacks has increased exponentially. This puts both governments and corporations at greater risk, with an ever-evolving and highly sophisticated threat landscape that poses a constant challenge for cybersecurity experts.

Addressing the Conundrum

To address the disparity between breaches experienced by the government versus corporations, several key measures can be taken by governments to strengthen their resilience against attacks.

Modernizing Legacy Systems: Government agencies should prioritize the modernization of legacy technology to ensure they are equipped with the latest security features and updates. This requires streamlined decision-making processes and adequate allocation of funds to support technological upgrades.

Emphasizing Cybersecurity Awareness and Training: Both government and corporate organizations should invest in comprehensive cybersecurity awareness and training programs. Human error remains a significant vulnerability, and educating personnel about cybersecurity threats and best practices can significantly reduce the risk of successful attacks.

Implementing Comprehensive Security Measures: Governments should adopt a centralized, comprehensive cybersecurity strategy that expands across departments and agencies. Implementing a unified security framework will help address potential gaps and inconsistencies in defenses, enhancing overall resilience.

Promoting Collaboration and Information Sharing: Government entities and corporations can benefit from sharing threat intelligence and collaborating on cybersecurity initiatives. Establishing partnerships between the public and private sectors can lead to a more robust and proactive defense against cyber threats.

Bridging The Divide

The perceived disparity in the number of reported breaches between the US government and corporations stems from various factors, including the government’s public obligation to report incidents of all sizes. However, legacy technology and fragmented security approaches within some government agencies contribute significantly to their increased vulnerability to attacks in the first place.

To bridge this gap, government agencies should take a cue from the private sector and prioritize modernizing their technological infrastructure and adopting a centralized cybersecurity approach. By investing in cybersecurity awareness and training, and collaborating with the private sector, both governments can fortify their digital defenses and navigate the evolving threat landscape with greater effectiveness. Through collective efforts, we strive to secure our digital future and safeguard against malicious actors aiming to exploit our interconnected world.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Ready to get started?

Get in touch with our experts today.

CONTACT US Request an Assessment